<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cost Efficiency &#8211; Incandescent Bulbs vs. Fluorescent Bulbs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.milwaukeehomeimprovementblog.com/uncategorized/cost-efficiency-incandescent-bulbs-vs-fluorescent-bulbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.milwaukeehomeimprovementblog.com/uncategorized/cost-efficiency-incandescent-bulbs-vs-fluorescent-bulbs/</link>
	<description>Home Improvement, DIY and BEYOND... :)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 20:29:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Milwaukee Home Improvement Blog &#187; The Future of lighting &#8211; GE&#8217;s LED Light Bulb</title>
		<link>http://www.milwaukeehomeimprovementblog.com/uncategorized/cost-efficiency-incandescent-bulbs-vs-fluorescent-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Milwaukee Home Improvement Blog &#187; The Future of lighting &#8211; GE&#8217;s LED Light Bulb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milwaukeehomeimprovementblog.com/?p=88#comment-54</guid>
		<description>[...] getting some emails about our post on CFL&#8217;s vs standard incandescents it seems we overlooked the next option. Expected to ship in 2011, GE will be bringing to marked a 9 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] getting some emails about our post on CFL&#8217;s vs standard incandescents it seems we overlooked the next option. Expected to ship in 2011, GE will be bringing to marked a 9 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

